Plymouth children at risk of losing free school lunch

News Desk
Authored by News Desk
Posted: Tuesday, June 6, 2017 - 08:54

7,884 Plymouth children aged 4-7 years will no longer receive free school meals if the proposals to axe universal infant free school meals (UIFSM) goes ahead.

This includes 1,259 children who live in poverty. In the Plymouth Moor View constituency alone, 3203 infants would miss out, 563 of whom are in poverty, with a similar picture in Plymouth Sutton & Devonport, where 2817 infants would miss out, 529 are in poverty.

A new school survey carried out for the Soil Association’s Food for Life programme showed that 37% of schools in England fear that their school meal service will close if the infants’ free school meals are slashed. This rises to 47% if it is a small school with its own kitchen.

91% of schools surveyed believe that pupil health and nutrition would be impacted by the potential withdrawal of free school meals for all infants. For many children this is the only hot meal they get in the day.

This survey emerges days after LACA, the Lead Association for Catering in Education, said that 16,800 jobs in the catering sector could be lost, equivalent to 21% nationally, if Universal Infant Free School Meals were to be scrapped.

Jamie Oliver, who has been campaigning to save infant free school meals, said: “If the cuts to free school meals go ahead, it will be a huge backwards step for children’s health. There’s no replacing a cooked school lunch, it’s just not the same. Healthier school food was a major pillar in the government’s already pitiful childhood obesity plan. Take this pillar out of the plan and you are left with nothing because it props up the whole system and helps to increase the numbers of paying parents. It’s bad for kids, bad for local jobs, bad for local communities. This survey shows it's bad for schools too.”

Brad Pearce, of Plymouth school caterer, CATERed, commented on the proposed cuts [4]: “For Plymouth, UIFSM means approximately 1 million extra meals a year are being served to children from families who are “just about managing” and fall outside of the benefit-based FSM criteria as working families.  We’ve seen paid take-up in Key Stage 2 children increase by over 10% since introduction too.  A clear example of available disposable income following UIFSM so older siblings can now take a lunch.”

He continued, “We have increased our frontline staff numbers to cope with increased demand of UIFSM so have created employment – if numbers dropped to pre-UIFSM levels then we would be looking at 20-25% of jobs potentially going.”

Co-author of the School Food Plan Henry Dimbleby said: “This survey is further proof, if it were needed, that removing Universal Infant Free School Meals would be disruptive, unpopular and woefully short-sighted. Head teachers - the people with the best on-the-ground view of what works in schools - say universally that withdrawing UIFSM will hurt pupils health and that free breakfasts are not a viable substitute.”

James Cashmore, Director, Food for Life at the Soil Association, commented, “It’s clear from this survey that primary schools are hugely concerned about the potential withdrawal of Universal Infant Free School Meals, a policy which was backed by all political parties just three years ago, and which should continue to be supported by the new government. Our findings indicate that less than 4% of schools believe that an offer of a free breakfast for all primary school pupils is a good alternative to a hot lunch. In contrast, 91% believe that pupil health and nutrition would be affected, and importantly 3 in 5 schools believe that pupil attainment would also suffer.

"For hundreds of thousands of children from ordinary families, school lunch is the only hot meal that they receive. Scrapping free school meals for all infants would also mean absolute economic disaster for many school kitchens, with complete closure predicted in around 2 in 5 schools - many of whom stretched their own budgets to invest in upgraded facilities and support the policy in the past three years. "

Those who are against the proposed cuts are being encouraged to let their local candidates know this is an important issue for them, and to sign a petition started by a headmaster which has over 50,000 supporters: www.change.org/SaveSchoolLunches

Tags